NYSDOH Funeral Firm Phone Field: Source and Scope

Direct answer and scope

The official source for the phone field is the New York State Department of Health Opened Firms report. In the checked report, phone is one of several administrative fields presented for a listed firm. The accompanying fields are firm name, address, city, ZIP code, county, and manager, and the checked source revision was July 2026.

Read the phone value together with those accompanying fields. A number beside a firm name can be distinguished more carefully when the associated street address, city, ZIP code, county, and manager are retained. This approach preserves the structure of the official record and avoids treating a single contact field as a complete description of an organization.

The supported status is that a firm is listed in the Opened Firms report with the stated source revision. The record provides administrative identity, contact, and manager information. It does not provide ratings, quality findings, or an endorsement, so the phone value carries none of those meanings.

How to use the official evidence

Begin with the firm-name field and then read across the same administrative record. Compare the phone value with the address, city, ZIP code, county, and manager shown for that firm. The purpose is to preserve which fields appeared together in the dated Opened Firms report, not to add characteristics that the report does not contain.

Next, note the source revision. July 2026 identifies the revision of the checked report and provides the time context for the extracted fields. It is distinct from the directory verification date, which records when the directory performed the registry-based checks used for its displayed evidence.

The directory’s validated display can include the registered firm fields, source revision, active-manager name match, closed-firm conflict result, and verification date. These items come from more than one evidence step: the Opened Firms record supplies the administrative firm fields, while the additional results document checks involving the active-director and closed-firm records used by the directory.

Keep each result within its stated function. The firm fields identify what appears in the Opened Firms record. The source revision identifies the checked report version. The verification date identifies the directory’s check date. The active-manager name match and closed-firm conflict result record specific comparison outcomes. None is a substitute for a rating or quality finding.

Decision framework

Use a field-by-field sequence when interpreting a directory entry. First, identify the firm name associated with the phone value. Second, confirm that the address, city, and ZIP code belong to the same displayed record. Third, retain the county and manager context. Fourth, record the July 2026 source revision. Finally, distinguish that source revision from the directory verification date and review the separately displayed registry-check results.

If the immediate task is to understand where a number came from, the relevant conclusion is narrow: the phone value was drawn from the administrative record for a firm listed in the checked Opened Firms report. If the task is to distinguish similarly named records, the address, city, ZIP code, county, and manager fields provide the available record context. These uses stay within the fields supplied by the report.

For directory verification, consider the displayed elements as a set without merging their meanings. The source revision describes the official report version. The verification date describes the date used by the directory. An active-manager name match reports a name comparison, while a closed-firm conflict result reports the outcome of the directory’s closed-firm check. Each element answers a different documentary question.

Do not turn the combined display into a broader conclusion. The evidence can document the fields and checks included in the measured registry snapshot, but it does not establish completeness outside that snapshot. It also does not convert administrative listing information into an assessment of service quality.

Limits and what to verify next

The Opened Firms report has a defined administrative scope. It exposes identity, contact, and manager fields, including the phone value, but it contains no ratings, quality findings, or endorsement. A reader should therefore avoid using the phone field, manager field, or listed status as evidence of an evaluation that the report does not make.

The directory’s evidence display is also limited to implemented fields that pass its publication validation. It can show registered firm fields, the source revision, the active-manager name-match result, the closed-firm conflict result, and the directory verification date. That display documents the measured registry snapshot rather than information beyond the checked fields.

When checking the record again, verify the phone value in the current Opened Firms report and keep it aligned with the corresponding firm name and location fields. Also identify the report’s current revision rather than assuming that a July 2026 value remains unchanged. For directory evidence, distinguish the official source revision from the date on which the directory performed its checks.

Any question not answered by the listed administrative fields requires evidence suited to that separate question. The Opened Firms record itself supports the firm name, address, city, ZIP code, phone, county, manager, and dated listing context. Its scope should not be enlarged to cover unmeasured attributes.

Evidence behind this page

Each point below is restricted to what the cited primary source supports. Administrative listing status is not a quality endorsement.